Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A. Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.

firm overview
practice areas
attorney profiles
contact forms
recruiting
resource links
office locations / phone / fax
what's new

Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.
Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A. Office
Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A. Office
Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.
Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.

May 2007- Summary Judgment Entered in Favor of the Defendant in UIM Case

Evans Brittain obtained a summary judgment in favor of the Defendant UIM carrier in Elmore County. The trial court held that the Plaintiff was not legally entitled to recover from the UIM carrier because the Plaintiff had previously settled with the tortfeasor, a governmental entity, for the maximum amount recoverable pursuant to the statutory cap concerning governmental entities.


Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.
Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A. Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A. Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.

firm overview | practice areas | attorney profiles | contact forms | recruiting | resource links | office locations / phone / fax | what's new | home


"No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers."

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Copyright © by Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.

Thomson Reuters   

This FirmSite® is designed and hosted by FindLaw®, a service of Thomson Reuters, Eagan, Minnesota.

Ball, Ball, Matthews & Novak, P.A.